|
Green Development
The green development cluster includes
specialized wood product manufacturing industries, architects, engineers and
other professional services.
About two thirds of employment in this cluster
is in manufacturing industries with the other third coming form professional
services.
Average
wage 2006:
$43,
335
Cluster employment 2006: 41, 909
Average wage growth 2003-2006: 9.36%
Cluster Employment Growth 2003-2006: 8.05%
Source: BLS, QCEW data based on cluster
definition from 2005 Cogan Owens Cogan report for OECDD. Exact NAICS codes
used available upon request.
|
Green Development Cluster
Sponsoring Organization: OECDD
Geography: Portland Metro Area
Date: September 2007
Contact: Tom Osdoba
(503) 823-2317
Background
The
Green Development Cluster has been meeting since January of 2007. Convened by
the Oregon Economic and Community Development Department, the cluster quickly
organized itself and identified several key initiatives among a list of short
and long-term goals that the group determined would accelerate green
development in Oregon and strengthen Oregon’s competitiveness in the global
economy.
Geographic
Location
Primarily
Portland Metro with connections to Salem and Hood River
Oregon
Advantages/Industry Drivers
-
Political leadership
(Governor Tom McCall, state & political leaders at all levels)
-
Business Energy Tax
Credit (BETC)
-
Collaborative
Culture—connections between industry, government & community
organizations and connections with other industries (ex. Agriculture,
forestry)
-
Lower costs for
professional services (designers, building, architects, etc.), electricity,
and housing relative to other competitor regions (i.e., Bay Area)
-
Intellectual
Capital—workforce with sustainability skills, understanding, & attitudes
-
Quality of Life/
Livability- transportation and land use planning
-
Natural
Resources: water, wind, waves, timber
Cluster
Challenges
-
Education and
decreasing intellectual capital. Getting harder to find skills needed as the
industry evolves quickly, people with talent leave, and the population ages.
-
Quality of life and
livability in jeopardy: A) Measure 37 creates problems; Measure 49 is not the
ultimate solution. Need to continue to address land use planning and
affordability issues. B) Must connect land use and transportation, and C)
develop a vision of affordable walkable communities statewide (Good Models:
Sweden, Curitiba, Brazil, Berkeley, Santa Monica)
-
Divides/ voids
between A) the natural resource community and the sustainability community and
B) Urban/rural regions
Cluster Action Initiatives
Current High Priority Initiatives
Create an ecosystems services marketplace (will help rural communities,
agriculture and forestry industry, environment) and Encourage more developers
to be ecosystems-neutral
Fast track permitting for green building
Develop climate friendly mortgage,
appraisal, and insurance products
Commercial forum—Create a
“commercial support forum”— an entity (physical & on-line) that will
entertain inquiries regarding opportunities to fill market demands/create new
businesses
Short-Term Initiatives
Adopt a state policy platform, e.g., 2030 Challenge (all new buildings
shall be carbon-neutral by 2030; all new buildings, developments and major
renovations designed to meet a fossil fuel, GHG-emitting, energy consumption
performance standard of 50% of the regional (or country) average for that
building type)
Buy Local Campaign- Keep more capital investment within the state (See
Import Substitution study on green building products)
Create mandatory re-commissioning incentives & retrofit programs to
upgrade homes & commercial buildings
Create a home Energy Performance
Certificate – a “currency” valuation recognized in sales transactions
Long-Term Initiatives
Integrate sustainability into our education system by making it a core part
of K-20 educational curriculum, creating
integrated degree programs and professional certifications for building
trades, etc.
Increase the cost of power to encourage energy efficiency in residential
and commercial buildings. Include incentive programs to help less affluent
citizens
Promote the Oregon Small-Scale Energy Loan Program (SELP) and Energy Trust
loans
|